New Birth, New Inheritance (1 Peter 1:3-5)

We use the word “hope” far too casually.  Most often, we use “hope” as a synonym for “wishful thinking,” the verbal equivalent of crossing our fingers.  “I hope this recipe turns out ok,” we might say, or “I hope my team can maintain a strong defense in the last quarter.”  While these might be a way of looking forward to future events, we usually grant them no more than a week’s worth of significance—if that.

Columbia professor Andrew Delbanco uses “hope” as his way of defining “culture.”  A culture, Delbanco would say, is a group of people who share the same hope, or at least the same vision for the future.  For Americans, this means that we grow up bombarded with the “gospel” message of the American dream: get ahead; get rich; get what you want.  And, as we pointed out yesterday, we’ve allowed this message to strip away any true hope for the future for the tyrannical demands of Now.

When the early Christian writers used the word “hope,” they did so very carefully and very precisely.  For early Christians, the word “hope” was never rooted in some abstract fantasy, but rather in the certainty of God’s activity in human history.

In Peter’s letter, his first true lesson for the “chosen strangers” living in the hostile city of Rome was one of hope:

3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ! According to his great mercy, he has caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, 4 to an inheritance that is imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, kept in heaven for you, 5 who by God’s power are being guarded through faith for a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time. (1 Peter 1:3-5)

Do you see the beauty of Peter’s language?  We can see phrases like “great mercy,” “born again,” “living hope.”  This was a hope anchored in the historical reality of the resurrection of Jesus.  For early Christians, hope was certain: the physical resurrection of Jesus promised them that they, too, would one day be changed and would live again.

This was, at least in part, the “inheritance” that Peter speaks of.  In the Old Testament, the word “inheritance” was often used to speak of Israel receiving the Promised Land (Numbers 32:19; Deuteronomy 2:12; Joshua 11:23).  In the New Testament, this sort of language testifies to our share in God’s Kingdom (Galatians 3:18; Ephesians 1:14).

Why does this matter?  Because hope replaces fear.  Look at Peter’s letter.  How does it describe this future inheritance?  It is imperishable, undefiled, unfading.  If you lived in a place like Rome—which Peter had pointed out had become the social equivalent of Babylon (1 Peter 5:13)—you were displaced from all sense of safety and comfort.  Your hostile social setting left you feeling like the ground was constantly moving beneath your feet.  What does Peter say?  He says that believers like you and I “are being guarded through faith for a salvation to be revealed.”  If my hope rests in the American dream—if my hope is in money, success, comfort, a relationship, politics, etc., then I have placed my hope in something that is “perishable,” “defiled,” “fading.”  I live in constant fear of losing that source of satisfaction and security.  I worry that the next political leader will “take my guns away,” or limit my capacity for religious expression.  True, there may be many things that would grieve us—and perhaps rightly.  But if my hope lies in my salvation, in the city of God and not the fading city of man, then that changes everything.  This new hope prompts me to find joy and satisfaction not in my present, but in God’s future—and to find joy in the knowledge that this promise can never be tarnished or stolen.

Being Chosen (1 Peter 1:1-2)

Our story begins in a boat.  The year was 33 A.D., and a man named Peter had chosen to go fishing with his fellow disciples.  Fishermen were known for being tough entrepreneurs; Peter had undoubtedly spent a lifetime devoted to the task.  At least until he encountered a man named Jesus, a man who asked him to no longer be merely a fisherman, but a fisher of men.  Peter followed Jesus with unrivaled zeal—yet when Jesus was betrayed and arrested, Peter chose to deny him three times rather than endure the social and physical consequences.  He fled then and in all likelihood, he was fleeing now.

At the end of John’s gospel, we learn that Jesus had returned from the dead.  The disciples were amazed at this—yet we can’t help but imagine that for Peter, this joyous news lay on his shoulders like a burial shroud.  True, the disciples were never forbidden from going fishing, but the raw emotion of this scene pushes us to see something deeper at work in the heart of Peter.

After an unsuccessful fishing venture, a mysterious figure calls to them from the shore, encouraging them to cast their nets on the right side of the boat.  The miraculous catch of fish made them realize just who this man was.  When Peter heard that this was the Lord, he put his clothes on, then dove into the water—in that order.  He arrived soaking wet, only to find Jesus already there with food prepared.  By the fire Jesus asked Peter: “Do you love me more than these?”  And Peter said that he loved him.  Three times Jesus asked this—as though undoing Peter’s earlier denials—and three times Jesus gives Peter the simple command: “feed my sheep.”

In the presence of grace, this would-be failure became one of the church’s greatest shepherds.  Years later, Peter would write at least two letters to the churches of the ancient world—letters we know today as 1 and 2 Peter.

1 Peter opens with a customary greeting:

Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ,

To those who are elect exiles of the Dispersion in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, 2 according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, in the sanctification of the Spirit, for obedience to Jesus Christ and for sprinkling with his blood:

May grace and peace be multiplied to you. (1 Peter 1:1-2)

No one in the ancient church doubted that Peter was, indeed, the author.  A few scholars today have raised an eyebrow as to how a mere fishermen would have such polished Greek, but in reality a skilled fisherman living in a Hellenized (that is, Greek-dominated) world would have had ample opportunity—and reason—to learn the language.  Paul wrote many letters to various churches throughout the ancient world.  Peter’s letters were much fewer, yet were aimed at a broader, non-specific audience—it’s why we call them “general letters.”  What was it that Peter wanted to say?  What was Peter trying to communicate?

LIVING IN A STATE OF EXILE

The greatest clue actually appears at the end of Peter’s first letter.  There, we find that Peter alludes to the presence of the church “in Babylon.”  Babylon?  Surely this couldn’t be the Babylon we know from the Old Testament—that area had been deserted long before Peter was even born.  There had been a Roman military colony named Babylon, but Peter wouldn’t have been writing from there, it seems.  So where was Babylon?

Babylon was Rome.  Early writers used the word “Babylon” to refer to the self-serving opulence of this great city, not far from the way we might shake our heads and marvel at the decaying values of “Hollywood” or even “Washington.”   In Peter’s day, there had yet to be any official persecution of Christians—though history tells us of some localized events.  But Rome was hardly friendly to early believers.  In a culture dominated by the competing values of “honor” and “shame,” it would have been shameful to associate oneself with a rival religion—especially one that sought to bestow honor on a crucified Savior.

Peter’s concern, then, is articulated in the word “exiles.”  To be a Christian in such a world is to run against the flow of an increasingly hostile culture.  They were exiles, in Peter’s day.  And we are increasingly exiles now.

How so?  If you are a follower of Jesus, you occupy a world that has grown increasingly hostile toward people of faith.  We can see that in two distinct ways:

  • “Athens” became “Babylon:”[1] A decade or so ago we assumed we lived in a world like Paul encountered in the city of Athens. We dealt with the question: “Is Christianity true?”  We read books about “worldviews” and philosophy.  We equipped ourselves to answer tough questions.  But the world we live in is more like Babylon than Athens.  We’re less concerned with the question “Is Christianity true?” and more concerned with the question: “Is Christianity good?”  And many would say: “No.”  A recent study was just released in which young people were asked if religion had a positive impact on society.  In 2010, 73% said “yes.”  Now, only 55% say yes—an 18% drop in five years.[2]
  • “Present shock:” NPR analyst Douglas Rushkoff said that technology has pushed us to become obsessed with the present. We are unmoored from a sense of story and direction.[3]  It’s not far from what CBS correspondent Peggy Noonan had lamented in the early 1990’s.  She said that ours was the first generation “that actually expected to find happiness here on earth.”  Past generations shared some cultural expectation of heaven and the afterlife.  We’ve come to value instant gratification.  Believe this lie, Noonan warns, then you are not disappointed when the world does not give you a good measure of its riches, you are despairing.”[4]

Thus we can carve out a simple picture of life in Babylon: unhappily unmoored from the promises of eternity, yet openly hostile toward those who place their hope in it.

ELECT EXILES

Yet we are what Peter calls “elect exiles.”  We are strangers to the world, true—but we are quite equally chosen by God.  Think about what this means for a second: it means that no matter how much believers are pushed to the frayed edges of society, we remain confident in possessing the approval of God even though we lack the approval of man.

This is why Peter makes specific reference to the act of “sprinkling,” an obvious nod to the covenant promises of old (Exodus 24) now made final in the sacrifice of Jesus.  In her commentary on 1 Peter, Karen Jobes points out that it’s as if Peter is emphasizing the specific nature of Christianity over “some generic form of spirituality.”[5]  That is, Christianity always connects us to a story far greater—and deeper—than the false narratives offered by our culture.

Christianity therefore remains deeply valuable for a world of hostility and confusion.  This is the world that Peter speaks into, hoping his voice will be echoed back by one of the “elect exiles,” one of the “chosen strangers.”  His letter invites us to live meaningfully by casting our eyes toward a better Kingdom to come while maintaining a faithful presence in the city of man.

 

 

 

 

[1] I borrow this distinction from Steve McAlpine, “Stage Two Exile: Are You Ready for It?” http://australia.thegospelcoalition.org/article/stage-two-exile-are-you-ready-for-it

[2] Hannah Fingerhut, “Millennials’ views of news media, religious organizations grows more negative,” January 4, 2016, http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/01/04/millennials-views-of-news-media-religious-organizations-grow-more-negative/

[3] See Douglas Rushkoff, Present Shock.

[4] Peggy Noonan, “You’d Cry Too if it Happened to You,”  Forbes magazine, September 14, 1992, archived online at: http://www.peggynoonan.com/47/

[5] Karen H. Jobes, 1 Peter, p. 71.

Life in Bedrock (1 Peter 1)

We begin our first sermon series of the 2016 year this coming Sunday. It will be seven weeks in duration and cover the book of 1 Peter. The title is “Chosen Strangers.”

Our introduction says:

What does it mean to be a Christian in a changing world?  Frustrated by the loss of “traditional” society, many of Christ’s followers find themselves wrestling with fear and anger. 

We’re not alone in this.   Early Christians would often refer to the Roman society as “Babylon”—a world whose stories, whose values ran counter to the character of Christ.  Peter was one of Jesus’ closest followers, and in the early days of the Church he wrote a letter of encouragement.  He describes Christians as “elect exiles” (1 Peter 1:1)—strangers to the world, yet chosen by a loving God.  Christians therefore greet suffering not with clenched fists, but with soft hearts, knowing that our hurt is only for “a little while,” while our hope stretches into eternity.  

In 1 Peter, what’s old is new again: the timeless message of the gospel offers hope for a world that presses us toward anger and despair.

In the opening two verses of the letter, we see to whom Peter was writing:

To God’s elect, strangers in the world, scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia and Bithynia, who have been chosen according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through the sanctifying work of the Spirit, for obedience to Jesus Christ and sprinkling by his blood.

Let me tell you a little bit about Cappadocia, which is in modern Turkey – toward the central / eastern border. The other regions spoken of would be to the north and west of the regions within Asia Minor, which is in modern Turkey – an area beyond where Paul established the churches to whom many of the New Testament letters are written.

Cappadocia is a very unique place – a place where the church flourished amongst pagan beliefs, and a place where Christians were terribly persecuted. They literally hid in cities underground, worshipping in churches carved out of the rocks.

I was there in the late 90s with a group of pastors and missions leaders, as our denomination was looking to build a Christian history center in this region, with a view toward a church planting movement. cappadocia

The best description I could give for what it looks like is to recall the cartoon “The Flintstones.”  Cappadocia actually looks like Bedrock. People live in caves, and unique rock formations are everywhere. In underground cities, hundreds of people lived in multiple levels of a labyrinth of caves. While there, we sat in a historic cave church with art on the walls and ceilings, and we read aloud this letter.

1st Peter was written to both Jewish and Gentile converts, believers who have grown in their faith, and yet were challenged to press further in their understanding. They were challenged to truly separate from the sinful world and to pursue holiness, understanding also that suffering for their faith was a common outcome of possessing a faith originally forged in the suffering of Christ himself.

Peter encouraged the Cappadocians to live like Christ in humble service, enduring the temporary sufferings of the present world for an eternal reward and crown. And that is a timeless message that is tremendously practical for our day.

Our devotional series over the next seven weeks will cover the book of 1 Peter and related themes over 28 writings, both by Randy and Chris. Each week you will find them early in the morning Mondays through Thursdays.