It’s a Not-so-wonderful Life (Ruth 1)

“Every time a bell rings, an angel gets his wings.”  These immortal words were spoken by little Zuzu, played by Karolyn Grimes in the beloved Christmas classic, It’s a Wonderful Life.  But for Grimes, “life has never been wonderful.”  In a 2011 interview with NBC news, she chronicles the death of her parents at age 12, her upbringing by her religiously-strict aunt and uncle, her husband’s cancer, her son’s suicide.  Yet she could always find comfort in looking back at the film that granted her early fame:

“It’s not a Christmas movie, not a movie about Jesus or Bethlehem or anything religious like that…It’s about how we have to face life with a lot of uncertainty, and even though nobody hears it, most of us ask God to show us the way when things get really hard… and (like in the film) it can be in Martini’s (bar), not a church on Christmas.”

Many people in our world feel the same—that religion has let them down, that Christmas can’t possibly bring us the joy it promises, as though Hallmark had written a check reality could never cash.

Jesus’ family tree contains a similar story.  In Matthew 1:5 we read that Jesus’ genealogy contains “Salmon the father of Boaz by Rahab, and Boaz the father of Obed by Ruth…”

The story of Ruth is a story of faith in hard times, of finding joy even in the margins.  The story is set during the time of the Judges, and its opening chapter deals a shocking blow as we narrow our focus to the characters of Naomi and Ruth:

In the days when the judges ruled there was a famine in the land, and a man of Bethlehem in Judah went to sojourn in the country of Moab, he and his wife and his two sons. 2 The name of the man was Elimelech and the name of his wife Naomi, and the names of his two sons were Mahlon and Chilion. They were Ephrathites from Bethlehem in Judah. They went into the country of Moab and remained there. 3 But Elimelech, the husband of Naomi, died, and she was left with her two sons. 4 These took Moabite wives; the name of the one was Orpah and the name of the other Ruth. They lived there about ten years, 5 and both Mahlon and Chilion died, so that the woman was left without her two sons and her husband.

In a primitive, patriarchal society, this was harsh news—and in some ways represented a possible death sentence.  Without the support and security of husbands, these women were forced to fend for themselves—made all the worse by the fact that “there was a famine in the land” (Ruth 1:1).

What would become of Naomi’s daughters-in-law now that their husbands had passed on?

6 Then she arose with her daughters-in-law to return from the country of Moab, for she had heard in the fields of Moab that the Lord had visited his people and given them food. 7 So she set out from the place where she was with her two daughters-in-law, and they went on the way to return to the land of Judah.8 But Naomi said to her two daughters-in-law, “Go, return each of you to her mother’s house. May the Lord deal kindly with you, as you have dealt with the dead and with me. 9 The Lord grant that you may find rest, each of you in the house of her husband!” Then she kissed them, and they lifted up their voices and wept. 10 And they said to her, “No, we will return with you to your people.”11 But Naomi said, “Turn back, my daughters; why will you go with me? Have I yet sons in my womb that they may become your husbands? 12 Turn back, my daughters; go your way, for I am too old to have a husband. If I should say I have hope, even if I should have a husband this night and should bear sons,13 would you therefore wait till they were grown? Would you therefore refrain from marrying? No, my daughters, for it is exceedingly bitter to me for your sake that the hand of the Lord has gone out against me.” 14 Then they lifted up their voices and wept again. And Orpah kissed her mother-in-law, but Ruth clung to her.

In his commentary on Ruth, Frederic Bush observes that given the primitive living conditions of the ancient world, it’s understandable that these women would abandon their mother-in-law in favor of finding their own security.  In some ways, it’s almost like on the airplane when you’re told that in an emergency, you should secure your own oxygen mask before you try and assist someone else.  But at the same time, we may marvel at the faith of Ruth—who clings, we’re told, to Naomi even though she’s not flesh-and-blood.

15 And she said, “See, your sister-in-law has gone back to her people and to her gods; return after your sister-in-law.” 16 But Ruth said, “Do not urge me to leave you or to return from following you. For where you go I will go, and where you lodge I will lodge. Your people shall be my people, and your God my God. 17 Where you die I will die, and there will I be buried. May the Lord do so to me and more also if anything but death parts me from you.” 18 And when Naomi saw that she was determined to go with her, she said no more.

Now the story has established this elegant yet sad partnership of Naomi and Ruth.  Like some men come to a funeral, these two women came to the town of Bethlehem.

19 So the two of them went on until they came to Bethlehem. And when they came to Bethlehem, the whole town was stirred because of them. And the women said, “Is this Naomi?” 20 She said to them, “Do not call me Naomi; call me Mara, for the Almighty has dealt very bitterly with me. 21 I went away full, and the Lord has brought me back empty. Why call me Naomi, when the Lord has testified against me and the Almighty has brought calamity upon me?”

22 So Naomi returned, and Ruth the Moabite her daughter-in-law with her, who returned from the country of Moab. And they came to Bethlehem at the beginning of barley harvest.

In the ancient world, names could often be used to reveal (or at least reflect) the contents of your heart.  So Naomi changed her name from Naomi (which meant “sweetness” or “pleasantness”) to Mara (meaning “bitter”).

At this point in the story, we find no real hope of resolution.  And perhaps we needn’t search for one.  The story, of course, is not over, but we remain confronted by the reality that life will not always bring comfort or immediate satisfaction.  Suffering is a part of life—part of the Christian journey, in fact.  Disappointment haunts us; anxiety lurks around every bend.  At Christmastime, these emotions become magnified by memories of loss, and reminders of failure.  The Christmas cards you sign by yourself—and not with your husband or wife.  The mantle that features one fewer stocking than last year—or the dinner table with one less plate.  Go through these experiences—endure these hardships—and Naomi’s name-change will no longer seem so strange.  Freud once argued that when we lose someone, we mourn not just the loss of the person but the loss of our role in relationship to that person.  He used the example of mothers who lost sons during wars.  These mothers grieve not just their sons, but also their identity as mothers.  Naomi experienced this same thing—and perhaps you do, too.  She missed her husband, she missed her sons—but she also had to grieve the fact that she was no longer a wife or a mother.

We can be thankful, then, that in our suffering we can still cling to the hope that we are adopted into God’s family.  Our earthly identities—whether as parents or spouses—may shift with the harsh winds of time and pain.  But the enduring truth is that we may count ourselves connected to God and his great family of believers.

And we can be all the more confident that God’s story hasn’t finished yet.  It’s no accident that the church historically celebrated “Advent”—looking not just to Jesus’ first coming, but his second.  A time when all would be made new.  When death and pain would be conquered.  Christmas—insofar as it is a day on the calendar—cannot possibly contain all of this hope.  All of this joy.  We must therefore learn to suffer as we look forward to this new day.

Just hold on.  Try to hold on.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “It’s a Not-so-wonderful Life (Ruth 1)

  1. I’ve had a lot of uncertainty in my life the past several years and a lesson or two from American History helped me to keep a perspective and not lose hope.

    Reading about the American Revolutionary War and the unlikely outcome of George Washington’s feeble army against the strongest army on the face of the earth … that was interesting but it also showed me that perseverance is usually necessary for any success against long odds.

    I read a book called Grant and Sherman – the Friendship that won the Civil War. Each of these man were relative failures in business before the war started. And they each had immense challenges after the war started. Sherman was nervous during the early part of the war to the point he could not function properly. General Grant was a soft spoken individual sidelined by jealous superiors to a desk job. In any case, things can look hopeless at times. After holding on, these men changed the future of the country.

    Ruth is to be commended for going beyond just trying to do the basics. She was apparently, to some extent, willing to lay down her life for Naomi. It looked like she was sacrificing her well-being for her friend of character Naomi.

    So then, those who suffer according to God’s will should commit themselves to their faithful Creator and continue to do good. (1Pe 4:19 NIV)

    Dear friends, do not be surprised at the painful trial you are suffering, as though something strange were happening to you. (1Pe 4:12 NIV)

    God disciplines us for our good, that we may share in his holiness. (Heb 12:10 NIV)

    Those whom I love I rebuke and discipline. So be earnest, and repent. (Rev 3:19 NIV)

    My son, do not despise the LORD’s discipline and do not resent his rebuke,
    because the LORD disciplines those he loves, as a father the son he delights in.
    (Pro 3:11-12 NIV)

    As for the troubles of life, they are not to be despised or resented. As I write this, I know I haven’t mastered that. While it doesn’t make sense to pray for troubles, it does make sense to pray that we will suffer whatever God wants us to suffer and that we will handle it and respond in the right way.

    There is a middle ground that is best for us that helps us to serve God.

    “Two things I ask of you, O LORD; do not refuse me before I die:
    Keep falsehood and lies far from me; give me neither poverty nor riches, but give me only my daily bread.
    Otherwise, I may have too much and disown you and say, ‘Who is the LORD?’ Or I may become poor and steal, and so dishonor the name of my God.
    (Pro 30:7-9 NIV)

    A comparatively more spiritual man like the apostle Paul is able to handle both extremes of poverty or riches.
    “I know what it is to be in need, and I know what it is to have plenty. I have learned the secret of being content in any and every situation, whether well fed or hungry, whether living in plenty or in want.
    I can do everything through him who gives me strength.
    Yet it was good of you to share in my troubles.”
    (Phi 4:12-14 NIV)

    And when the Apostle Paul was given such exceeding blessings of knowledge that were a threat to his groundedness, he was given a “thorn in the flesh” to help keep him grounded.

    Scriptures in Psalms talk about trials bringing people back to God. Jesus talks about God pruning the branches … in any case the natural human unchecked of course wanders from God. God has called us to serve Him rather than be self-centered.

    So while Ruth had a lot of faith and love that could be discussed … your angle in this blog was to “hold on”. Naomi probably had no idea that she was being used to bring a woman to Israel who one day be the ancestor of both the King of the Land as well as later the King of all those who will be in God’s glorious Kingdom.

    • Thomas, Thanks for the good word. My familiarity with American history is actually quite embarrassing, so your historical observations are all the more enlightening. And yes, hurts don’t go away just because we’re faithful. And, as you pointed out in the case of Ruth’s devotion to Naomi, sometimes faithfulness and commitment only intensify these hurts. But you are equally wise in noting the way trials can be used to bring us closer to God. The great thing–though the hard thing–is that we’ll never fully know some of the reasons “why,” only finding confidence in a plan greater than can be seen. Thanks, Thomas, for your thoughts.

What are you thinking?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s